PD04-10 COMPARATIVE URODYNAMIC STUDY IN CADAVER OF URETHRAL PRESSURE PROFILOMETRY BETWEEN THE UROMEMS ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER AND THE AMS800 ^TM

You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction/Female Pelvic Medicine: Male Incontinence: Therapy I (PD04)1 Sep 2021PD04-10 COMPARATIVE URODYNAMIC STUDY IN CADAVER OF URETHRAL PRESSURE PROFILOMETRY BETWEEN THE UROMEMS ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER AND AMS800 TM Aurélien Beaugerie, Florence Poinard, Anne Denormandie, Juliette Cotte, Christine Reus, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, and Pierre Mozer BeaugerieAurélien Beaugerie More articles by this author , PoinardFlorence Poinard DenormandieAnne Denormandie CotteJuliette Cotte ReusChristine Reus Chartier-KastlerEmmanuel Chartier-Kastler MozerPierre View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001968.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE: The Artificial Sphincter (AUS) is currently the standard care for men with severe Stress Incontinence (SUI). It’s also a treatment option SUI in women Europe. Urethral occlusion pressure transmitted cuff urethra determined Pressure Regulating Balloon (PRB), that cannot be adjusted after implantation. Low will affect functional result on continence, excessive could lead urethral erosion.The UroMems AUS an implantable device Control Unit (CU) which embeds automatic pump electronic components. This allows wirelessly set occlusive pressure, thereby personalizing therapy.The objective study compare cadavers range covered compared AMS800TM(Boston Scientific). METHODS: was conducted 6 cadavers, 3 males females. Each cadaver implanted cuff, around bulbous perineal approach males, bladder neck median incision For each cadaver, successively connected different PRB: 51-60 cmH2O, 61-70 cmH2O 71-80 cmH2O. PRB, Profilometry (UPP) done GobyTM urodynamic system (Laborie). PRB then replaced CU. After calibration, UPP pressures ranging from 10 150 increments main outcome Maximal Closing (MUCP). A correlation performed between CU MUCP. RESULTS: Cuff size were 4; 4,5 cm 5; 5,5 With mean MUCP 58 IC95%[53; 62], 66 [65; 68], 76 [70; 81] respectively. CU, 23 [16; 30] 120 [108; 131] respectively, as shown Figure 1. There significant both (r=0,99, p<0,01) females (r=0,97, p<0,01). CONCLUSIONS: In male female provides covers obtained PRB. Source Funding: N/A © 2021 American Urological Association Education Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e53-e54 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Expand Loading ...